diff --git a/talk.tex b/talk.tex
index 73cc374..03f2313 100644
--- a/talk.tex
+++ b/talk.tex
@@ -50,19 +50,15 @@
 % differences at sym point?
 % improvement at the symmetric point
 % example
-\begin{frame}
-	\frametitle{What is this all about?}
-	\begin{itemize}
-		\item working with exp. Wilson-clover fermions
-		\item massive $\Rightarrow$ at $N_{\rm f}=3$ symmetric point
-	\end{itemize}
-\end{frame}
 \begin{frame}
 	\frametitle{Relevance for further improvement and physics}
 	\begin{itemize}
-		\item needed for improv. determination of the PCAC quark-mass
-		\item decay constants
-		\item masses of mesons (e.g. $\chi_\mathrm{c1}$ or $D_\mathrm{1}^\ast$)
+		\item exp. Wilson-clover fermion framework
+		\item massive $\Rightarrow$ at $N_{\rm f}=3$ symmetric point
+		\vspace{.5cm}
+		\item needed for improv. quark current mass
+		\item decay constants & matrix elements
+		% \item masses of mesons (e.g. $\chi_\mathrm{c1}$ or $D_\mathrm{1}^\ast$)
 		\pause
 		\vspace{.5cm}
 		\item improvement and renormalisation:
@@ -77,9 +73,9 @@
 \begin{frame}
 	\frametitle{Determination of $\ca$}
 	\begin{itemize}
-		\item in Schrödinger functional boundary conditions
-		\item similar in quenched \arxivtag{hep-lat/9609035}, $N_{\rm f} = 2$ \arxivtag{hep-lat/0503003} and std. Wilson-Clover $N_{\rm f} = 3$ \arxivtag{1502.04999}
-		\item from PCAC mass 
+		\item Schrödinger functional boundary conditions
+		\item similar to quenched \arxivtag{hep-lat/9609035}, $N_{\rm f} = 2$ \arxivtag{hep-lat/0503003} and std. Wilson-Clover $N_{\rm f} = 3$ \arxivtag{1502.04999}
+		\item derive from PCAC mass 
 	\end{itemize}
 	\vspace{.5cm}
 	$$m_{\rm PCAC} = \frac{\partial_0 f_{\rm A}}{2f_{\rm P}} + \ca \frac{\partial^2_0 f_{\rm P}}{2f_{\rm P}} = r + \ca s$$
@@ -89,7 +85,7 @@
 \begin{frame}
 	\frametitle{The wavefunction method}
 	\begin{itemize}
-		\item mimic pionic sources on boundaries $\pi^{(0)}, \pi^{(1)}$ and require PCAC to hold
+		\item mimic pionic sources on boundaries $\pi^{(0)}, \pi^{(1)}$ and require PCAC relation to hold for both
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item basis wavefunctions:
 			$\omega_{\rm b1} = e^{-r/a_0}\;,\quad\omega_{\rm b2} = r~e^{-r/a_0}\;,\quad\omega_{\rm b3} = e^{-r/(2a_0)}$
@@ -113,7 +109,7 @@
 
 \begin{frame}
 	\frametitle{Ensembles}
-	\framesubtitle{$L\approx 3\,{\rm fm}$ Schrödinger-Functional ensembles, exp. Wilson-Clover fermions}
+	\framesubtitle{$T=L\approx 3\,{\rm fm}$ Schrödinger-Functional ensembles, exp. Wilson-Clover fermions}
 	\begin{center}
 		\begin{tabular}{cc|c|c|c|c}
 			\toprule
@@ -124,6 +120,7 @@
 			40&3.90&0.1388562&0.1386148&0.1386030&0.080\\
 			48&4.00&0.1384942&0.1384880&0.1382720&0.064\\
 			56&4.10&0.1381410&0.1380000&0.1379450&0.055\\
+			96&4.37&---&---&---&0.035\\
 			\bottomrule
 		\end{tabular}
 	\end{center}
@@ -147,7 +144,7 @@
 % interpolations
 \begin{frame}
 	\frametitle{Interpolation}
-	\framesubtitle{Hit symmetric and critical point exactly}
+	\framesubtitle{... to the symmetric and critical point}
 	\begin{itemize}
 		\item ensembles not exactly tuned
 		\item able to interpolate to the desired points due to two or three values per $\beta$