From 49109dac58260bac4d9541da47951be2202f420c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabian Joswig Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:01:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] docs: Explanation about ensemble names also made more explicit in examples. --- examples/01_basic_example.ipynb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/examples/01_basic_example.ipynb b/examples/01_basic_example.ipynb index e1041cf0..703e13b5 100644 --- a/examples/01_basic_example.ipynb +++ b/examples/01_basic_example.ipynb @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ - "From this we can construct `Obs`, which are the basic object of `pyerrors`. For each sample we give to the obs, we also have to specify an ensemble/replica name. In this example we assume that both datasets originate from the same gauge field ensemble labeled 'ensemble1'." + "From this we can construct `Obs`, which are the basic object of `pyerrors`. For each sample we give to the obs, we also have to specify an ensemble/replica name. In this example we assume that both datasets originate from the same gauge field ensemble labeled 'ensemble1'. **For correct error propagation it is crucial that observations from the same Monte Carlo chain are initialized with the same name.**" ] }, {