refactor!: Renamed methods smearing into index and smearing_symmetric

into matrix_symmetric
This commit is contained in:
Fabian Joswig 2022-02-08 14:06:04 +00:00
parent b8b3d6191f
commit 1196935e4e
2 changed files with 12 additions and 16 deletions

View file

@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
"Many methods we could use for regular correlators do not work with matrix-correlators. \n",
"In order to get the effective mass, we need to convert to a regular correlator first. \n",
"\n",
"One way to do it, is to pick a smearing out of the matrix:"
"One way to do it, is to pick an element out of the matrix:"
]
},
{
@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"single_smearing = matrix_V1V1.smearing(0,0)"
"single_smearing = matrix_V1V1.index(0,0)"
]
},
{
@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
"id": "5c25a23c",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"**Corr.smearing(i,j)** picks the element [i,j] from every matrix and returns a correlator containing one Obs per timeslice. \n",
"**Corr.index(i,j)** picks the element [i,j] from every matrix and returns a correlator containing one Obs per timeslice. \n",
"But there is a more usefull way to retrieve a single value per timeslice. \n",
"We might want a linear combination of different sources and sinks. \n",
"We can formalize this as\n",
@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
"This gives us a new correlator with one Obs per timeslice. We then calculate its effective mass and plot it. \n",
"We tell the **Corr.show** method to show another correlator as a comparison. \n",
"\n",
"We can see, that the projected correlator (*blue*) converges to a mass plateau much quicker than the single smearing."
"We can see, that the projected correlator (*blue*) converges to a mass plateau much quicker than the single smearing level."
]
},
{